KEY POINTS
- Former MP Craig Kelly has defeated and Australian Electoral Commission lawsuit over election posters.
- The AEC argued authorisations on Kelly's UAP posters, shown ahead of the federal election, were not clearly visible.
- But a Federal Court judge found they were and tossed the lawsuit.
Claims former politician Craig Kelly breached electoral laws by using non-compliant United Party Australia (UAP) federal election campaign material have been rejected by a court.
On Thursday, an Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) lawsuit against the firebrand ex-MP for the NSW seat of Hughes was dismissed in the Federal Court.
The AEC had argued Kelly's UAP posters - which were displayed in the run-up to the 2022 federal election - did not have all the required authorisations clearly visible.
The commission sought penalties against Kelly, claiming the authorisation lines - which list the person who approved the posters and their address - were not "reasonably prominent" or "legible at a distance" to voters.
Following the judgement, Craig Kelly (centre) criticised the Australian Electoral Commission saying that commissioner Tom Rogers should resign, sack someone, or at least issue an apology. Source: AAP / Matt Turner
He also claimed the AEC's sought-out decision denied him his implied constitutional freedom of government and political communication.
Justice Steven Rares tossed the lawsuit, finding the required details would have been "reasonably prominent" to a voter who approached the posters in broad daylight when they were intended to be read at voting time.
The law was not designed to operate "in each and every one of the possible ambient conditions at all hours of the day and night", the judge found.
"Rather, the determination only required, as a practical and reasonable measure, that the particulars be legible at one distance at which it is intended to be read," he said.
The AEC sought penalties against Kelly, claiming the authorisation lines were not "reasonably prominent" or "legible at a distance" to voters. Source: AAP / Mick Tsikas
Viewing the corflutes outside in broad daylight, the judge said he could see the authorisation lines "without difficulty".
He ordered the electoral commission to pay Kelly's legal costs.
On Twitter, Kelly criticised the AEC saying that commissioner Tom Rogers should resign, sack someone, or at least issue an apology.
"Someone at the Australian Electoral Commission should be out of a job by lunchtime today for abusing the AEC's powers and wasting at least $1 million of taxpayers money on a frivolous & malicious prosecution," he wrote.
An AEC spokesperson acknowledged the judgment but declined to comment further saying it would take time to fully review the court's reasons.
After switching from the federal Liberals to the Clive Palmer-backed UAP, Kelly failed to retain Hughes which was won by the Liberal Party's Jenny Ware.
